According to researchers at the University of Wisconsin, the 1920’s advertising slogan “Guinness is Good for You
free finishing the game movie download ” may be true after all.
The original campaign stemmed from market research – when people told the company that they felt good after their pint, the slogan was born.
The team at Wisconsin tested the health-giving properties of stout against lager by giving it to dogs who had narrowed arteries similar to those in heart disease.
They found that those given the Guinness had reduced clotting activity in their blood, but not those given lager.
A daily pint of “the black stuff” could work as well as an aspirin to prevent heart clots that raise the risk of heart attacks. Experts from the University of Wisconsin concluded that drinking lager does not yield the same benefits.
So, I’m now safe in the knowledge that drinking “Liquid Genius” on a regular basis is doing me some good, and I’ll make sure it continues to be an integral part of my pre-race nutrition plan!
click on the guinness toucan image to order it from allposters.com
Original story: BBC News dead birds divx movie online
[...] Wisconsin concluded that drinking lager does not yield the same benefits. …Original post by Steve Speirs delivered by Medtrials and [...]
Pingback by It’s True - Guinness Is Good For You! by medTRIALS.info — September 14, 2007 @ 10:33 pm
I’m so glad to know you are taking good care of yourself
Comment by Gerri — September 15, 2007 @ 6:39 am
Hmmm… I am sure every guy will refer to this article every time his gf/wife starts to nag about drinking to much beer
Comment by Sandra — September 15, 2007 @ 8:58 pm
In moderation of course – that’s the secret!
Comment by Steve Speirs — September 15, 2007 @ 10:40 pm
I generally feel better after a beer or 10.
Comment by Nate Balcom — September 17, 2007 @ 2:46 pm
Hehe, cute post and here’s to your heatlh!
Comment by RecycleCindy — October 18, 2007 @ 8:28 am
Hmmm so its good for you but then again everyone says that about most drinks. But cheers to that
Comment by Gary Diamond — June 2, 2008 @ 5:24 am